Open House #2 - Oct. 16, 2024
On Oct. 16, 2024 a public second information centre was held at Rideau Heights Community Centre for the City of Kingston's new pedestrian bridge crossing at John Counter Boulevard and CN rail line as part of a Schedule "B" Municipal Class Environmental Assessment. The content from the display boards at that event is below.
Welcome to Public Information Centre #2
The purpose of Public Information Centre is to present information about the Environmental Assessment, provide the public with an opportunity to review and comment on the study process, existing conditions, and recommended preferred alternative solution. Representatives from the City of Kingston and their consultant, Egis Canada Ltd. (formerly McIntosh Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd.), are available to discuss the project and answer any questions
We want to hear from you as your involvement is key to the success of the New Pedestrian Bridge Crossing at John Counter Boulevard and CN Rail Line Environmental Assessment. Please sign in before leaving! More details about the project are available on the project website: getinvolved.cityofkingston.
Municipal Class Environmental Assessment
- The Kingston Pedestrian Bride Environmental Assessment will be completed in accordance with a Schedule ‘B’ Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (MCEA) and will complete Phases 1 to 2.
- The MCEA is a process by which municipal infrastructure projects (municipal roads, bridges, water and wastewater) are planned in accordance with the Environmental Assessment Act.
- The MCEA gives due regard to protect the environment, impacts, and includes the involvement of affected stakeholders in the decision-making process.
- More information on the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Process is on the Municipal Engineers website.
Project Study Area
The City of Kingston is initiating a study to identify alternative solution for potentially a new pedestrian and cycling crossing anticipated to cross over John Counter Boulevard and the CN Rail line to provide a north-south connection for the existing Kingston and Pembroke Trail (K & P Trail), between Division Street and Elliot Avenue. The existing K&P Trail (Purple Line) within the study area runs from Division Street at Weller Avenue, along Division Street to John Counter Boulevard, and then to Elliot Avenue
Project understanding
- The City of Kingston’s 2018 Active Transportation Master Plan (ATMP) – branded as Walk ‘n’ Roll Kingston – was designed and developed specifically for Kingston.
- In efforts to implement the City’s ATMP, the City of Kingston prepared a Five-Year Active Transportation Implementation Plan (ATIP) which identified infrastructure, programming, and operational investments to foster a culture of active transportation in Kingston.
- The plan prioritizes improvements to create an integrated city-wide active transportation network, identifies opportunities to develop neighbourhood-level connections, and outlines plans for programming and policy initiatives
- The need for a new pedestrian and cycling crossing over John Counter Boulevard and the CN Rail line between Division Street and Elliot Avenue, was identified in the City’s ATMP and the initiation of this study was committed in the City’s ATIP.
- A new pedestrian crossing over John Counter Blvd. and CN Rail Line, will enhance the north/south connectivity along the K&P Trail, as well as provide connectivity to City wide Active Transportation Cycling Routes, including existing on-road cycling facilities on John Counter Boulevard. This will help enhance numerous modes of transportation and public spaces by providing safe facilities for a variety of street users along John Counter Boulevard.
- Learn more about the Active Transportation Master Plan (ATMP) & Five-Year Active Transportation Implementation Plan (ATIP).
Problem and opportunity statement
The City of Kingston is committed to shifting its dominant mode of transportation from automobiles to active transportation. A new pedestrian crossing over John Counter Boulevard and the CN Rail Line will enhance north-south connectivity along the Kingston and Pembroke Trail (K&P Trail) and provide connectivity to city-wide Active Transportation Cycling Routes, including existing on-road facilities on John Counter Boulevard. Therefore, the City of Kingston has the opportunity to identify and evaluate alternative solutions to determine the best location and design for the pedestrian bridge crossing, in accordance with the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Process.
Environment existing conditions
Natural Environment
- Gray Ratsnakes and Small-Footed Myotis bats (Species-at-Risk (SAR)) are likely present within the study area due to the limestone bedrock and the maternity roosting trees they use for their habitats.
- Red-headed Woodpeckers have historically been in the area and may still be present, despite their declining population.
- There are no SAR turtles within the study area, as there are no watercourses or ditch lines connecting the study area to the Greater Cataraqui Marsh Complex located east of it.
- The surrounding landscape consists of forested areas along the CN Rail Line, open spaces, manicured grass, and landscaped areas, featuring a mix of native and non-native species.
- No rare species or vegetation communities were found within the study area, and no fish or fish habitat were observed within or adjacent to it.
Land Use
- The study area and lands directly adjacent are identified on the City of Kingston’s Official Plan as Regional Commercial, Arterial Commercial, Residential, and General Industrial.
- The City of Kingston owns the John Counter Boulevard Right-of-Way (ROW).
- There is an existing CN Rail Line corridor that runs adjacent to John Counter Boulevard for the entire length of the study area.
- Approximately 1 km of the K&P Trail fall within the study area.
Proposed alternative solutions
Alternative solutions | Description of proposed alternative solution |
---|---|
1 | Cantilever/attach a new pedestrian bridge to the existing Division Street Bridge and maintain/update active transportation facilities on John Counter Boulevard. |
2a | Rehabilitate Division Street Bridge to provide passage across the bridge for pedestrian/ cyclists and maintain/upgrade active transportation facilities on John Counter Boulevard including Division Street and John Counter Boulevard intersection. |
2b (new) | Replacement of Division Street Bridge with new MUP/K&P Trail across the bridge for pedestrian/ cyclists and maintain/upgrade active transportation facilities on John Counter Boulevard including Division Street and John Counter Boulevard intersection. |
3 | Align a new standalone pedestrian bridge adjacent to the existing Division Street Bridge and maintain/update active transportation facilities on John Counter Boulevard. |
4 | Align with the City owned property north-south orientation adjacent to Day Street and north of CN Rail Line near Worthington Way. |
5 | Align a new standalone pedestrian bridge from the north ROW extension of Day Street diagonally across John Counter Boulevard and CN Rail line to City Owned property. |
6 | Align a new standalone pedestrian bridge along the City owned property in the north-south orientation east of Day Street connecting to Elliott Avenue. |
7 | Align a new standalone pedestrian bridge along the City owned property diagonally over the CN Rail Line but not over John Counter Boulevard. |
8 | Align a new standalone pedestrian bridge from the ROW at the intersection of John Counter Boulevard and Elliott Avenue perpendicular across John Counter Boulevard and CN Rail line to CN Rail property. |
9 | Do-Nothing - A ‘Do Nothing’ scenario will be evaluated as a baseline comparison to other alternatives developed in this study. |
Evaluation criteria
Transportation / Technical
Criteria to evaluate whether the proposed alternative solutions addresses the Active transportation problems and opportunities identified for this study; as well as evaluate the technical suitability and engineering characteristics of the design concept.
- Active Transportation
- Connectivity
- Accessibility
- Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety
- Transportation / Infrastructure Plans and Policies
- Constructability
- Durability/Service Life
- Structural Engineering Risks
Utilities
Natural Environment
Criteria to evaluate the alternative solutions’ effects on the natural heritage systems, natural environment and habitats, air and water quality.
- Environmentally Sensitive Areas
- Wildlife Habitats (Terrestrial)
- Species at Risk
- Existing Watercourses
- Air Quality/Climate Change
Social and Cultural Environment
Criteria to evaluate the alternative solutions effects on businesses, community and social features, properties, First Nations and archaeological, built and cultural heritage features within the study area.
- Land Use / Socio-Economic Conditions
- Planning Policy
- Aesthetics
- Archaeological, Built Heritage and Cultural Heritage Features
- Construction/Maintenance Impacts
- Public Input / Stakeholder Consultation
Implementation
Criteria to evaluate the financial implications and implementation opportunities of the alternative solutions.
- Capital Costs
- Operation Costs
- Permitting/Approval
- Property Impacts
- Utility
Preliminary evaluation of alternative solutions
Alternative Solutions | Description | Advantage | Disadvantage | Carry forward or not |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Cantilever/attach a new pedestrian bridge to the existing Division Street Bridge and maintain/update active transportation facilities on John Counter Boulevard. |
|
|
Carry forward |
2a | Rehabilitate Division Street Bridge to provide passage across the bridge for pedestrian/ cyclists and maintain/upgrade active transportation facilities on John Counter Boulevard including Division Street and John Counter Boulevard intersection. |
|
|
Not carry forward |
2b | Replacement of Division Street Bridge with new MUP/K&P Trail across the bridge for pedestrian/ cyclists and maintain/upgrade active transportation facilities on John Counter Boulevard including Division Street and John Counter Boulevard intersection. |
|
|
Carry forward |
3 | Align a new standalone pedestrian bridge adjacent to the existing Division Street Bridge and maintain/update active transportation facilities on John Counter Boulevard. |
|
|
Not carry forward |
4 | Align a new standalone pedestrian bridge from the north ROW extension of Day Street perpendicular across John Counter Boulevard and CN Rail line to CN Rail property. |
|
|
Not carry forward |
5 | Align a new standalone pedestrian bridge from the north ROW extension of Day Street diagonally across John Counter Boulevard and CN Rail line to City Owned property. |
|
|
Not carry forward |
6 | Align a new standalone pedestrian bridge along the City owned property in the north-south orientation east of Day Street connecting to Elliott Avenue. |
|
|
Carry forward |
7 | Align a new standalone pedestrian bridge along the City owned property diagonally over the CN Rail Line but not over John Counter Boulevard. |
|
|
Carry forward |
8 | Align a new standalone pedestrian bridge from the ROW at the intersection of John Counter Boulevard and Elliott Avenue perpendicular across John Counter Boulevard and CN Rail line to CN Rail property. |
|
|
Not carry forward |
Evaluation of alternative solutions
Alternative 9 – Do nothing
Transportation and engineering: Not Preferred
Land use planning objectives: Not Preferred
Natural Environment: Less Preferred
Social/Cultural Environment: Not Preferred
Economic Environment: Less Preferred
Summary
Not Recommended: Does not meet the objectives of the P&O Statement.
- A ‘Do Nothing’ scenario was evaluated as a baseline comparison to other alternatives developed in this study.
- Does not meet the objectives of the Problem and Opportunity Statement
Alternative 1 – Cantilever to Division Street Bridge
Transportation and engineering: Less Preferred
Land use planning objectives: Less Preferred
Natural Environment: Preferred
Social/Cultural Environment: Preferred
Economic Environment: Preferred
Summary
Not Recommended: Addresses the P&O Statement and consistent with planning policy and objectives.
- Direct connection for pedestrians and cyclists traveling between the Rideau Heights and Kingscourt communities.
- Requires significant structural work to safely cantilever proposed pedestrian bridge off the side of Division Street Bridge.
- Maintaining the Divisions Street Bridge in its current state which doesn’t comply with AODA requirements.
- Lower return on investment as bridge service life will be depended on the rehabilitation of the bridge.
Alternative 2b – Replacement of Division Street Bridge
Transportation and engineering: Preferred
Land use planning objectives: Less Preferred
Natural Environment: Preferred
Social/Cultural Environment: Preferred
Economic Environment: Preferred
Summary
Recommended: Addresses the P&O Statement and consistent with planning policy and objectives.
- Direct access for the Rideau Heights and Kingscourt communities to schools, local businesses, and commercial areas.
- Maintains continuity with the K&P Trails.
- Highest return on investment, greatest cost/benefit.
- Aligns within City owned property/CN easement.
- New bridge will be designed to meet AODA requirements.
Alternative 6 – Rock Outcrop Crossing
Transportation and engineering: Preferred
Land use planning objectives: Preferred
Natural Environment: Not Preferred
Social/Cultural Environment: Less Preferred
Economic Environment: Less Preferred
Summary
Not Recommended: Addresses the P&O Statement and consistent with planning policy and objectives.
- New bridge will be designed to meet AODA requirements.
- Maintains continuity of K&P Trail.
- The K&P Trail would need to be rerouted down Elliott Avenue to reach the new pedestrian bridge.
- Not direct access for the Rideau Heights and Kingscourt communities.
- Potential conflicts with existing infrastructure.
- Potentially requires a new approval from CN Rail for a new easement agreement over the railway tracks.
Alternative 9 – John Counter Boulevard Diagonal Crossing
Transportation and engineering: Preferred
Land use planning objectives: Preferred
Natural Environment: Less Preferred
Social/Cultural Environment: Less Preferred
Economic Environment: Not Preferred
Summary
Not Recommended: Addresses the P&O Statement and consistent with planning policy and objectives.
- Aligns within City owned property.
- New bridge will be designed to meet AODA requirements.
- Maintains continuity of K&P Trail being primarily an off-road trail.
- Requires new Intersection Pedestrian Signal (IPS) at Elliott Avenue to connect to K&P Trail.
- Not direct access for the Rideau Heights and Kingscourt communities to schools, local businesses, and commercial areas.
- Longest spanning bridge and highest capital cost.
Proposed Alternative Solution 2b
Proposed Alternative Solution 6
Proposed Alternative Solution 7
Project schedule and next steps
Q4 2024 - Public Information Centre #2 - Present recommended alternative solution
Q4 2024 - Advertise project file report for a 30-day public review and comment period
Q4 2024 - Project completion
- Review and address public comments received and consider in the evaluation of alternative solutions;
- Update evaluation matrix and confirm selection of recommended Preferred Alternative Solution based on consultation;
- Identify impacts of recommended Preferred Alternative Solution on the environment and develop mitigation measures, and
- Select the Preferred Alternative Solution, to address the Problem and Opportunity Statement identified in Phase 1.
Thank you for your contribution!
Help us reach out to more people in the community
Share this with family and friends