Murals on Private Property

216 engaged participants completed surveys 

511 aware participants visited the project page 

12 participants created a new Get Involved Kingston account 

no 

Will make it more colourful, full of character and memorable for people who visit here.  

100% improvement. I want more everywhere. 

it will add character, colour and vibrancy to the community as well as making our city look , feel unique and ever changing  

I like the idea. Murals on private property will foster connection between people. 

It'll add a nice artistic touch, and make some drab buildings look better 

No 

I view these murals extremely positively 

It would be a great way to garner support for local artists and add to neighborhood pride and individuality. 

I have my fears. 

It will be uplifting for older dilapidated building until such time as they can be replaced.  It has been very successful in other cities. 

double edge sword. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder 

Great exposure for local artists and improvement from old buildings not painted. 

If done properly will be a wonderful addition 

More art is better for everyone!  

Done well they could bring brightness and interest to the city 

It'll bring life and culture to Kingston. I love the idea. We've seen how beautiful murals can be in cities like Montreal. They're a tourist attraction and make boring buildings more interesting. 

I think they add immensely to the attractiveness of Kingston -- the new one on Princess St near Division is very attractive and brightens an otherwise dull area 

It will add colour and vibrancy to what tends to be a very "grey" environment 

If done tastefully might add some color 

Kingston has so many new developments that feature all the same architecture / colour schemes. We need more colour, vibrancy and diversity.  

We have amazing local artists, and this would be a great way for them to find employment while adding value to our neighbourhoods. 

It will create a more vibrant, positive, expressive community that will help convey that Kingston is a city that values community, art, positivity, and imagination. 

Big improvement! 

It will add colour, beauty, a diversity of expression, and a unique identity to the city. 

I think it would make Kingston feel more unique, interesting, open minded, diverse, and progressive.  

i think they would open up the walking pleasure around the city. 

It will make the city even more unique and wonderful to see.  

LOVE IT!! I am tired of seeing vast concrete monoliths! 

I think having murals on private property will improve the city's overall aesthetic and is a great support to local artists.  

Make it more interesting and colourful in the long winter 

It would look inviting and vibrant. A place you want to live, play and work in. Perhaps contribute to some historical factor. 

If they are done with some skill and are not political, racist etc.  

There are many murals on residential buildings in bigger cities like Montreal, and it makes walking through neighbourhoods more interesting and rewarding and offers good exposure for the artists. 

It’s fine as long as it’s tasteful.  
I love murals  

It will help Kingston feel younger and more diverse. 

Vibrancy, beauty, interest 

It's a wonderful idea I have visited many cities which have these and it invariably is a very popular attraction for both locals and tourists. 

I think they are a beautiful addition to the city and I would fully support more of them. 

A well done, tasteful, colourful mural, especially on multi-storey otherwise bland brick buildings, looks wonderful. It improves the look of the building as well as the streetscape around the building.  

I think it's a wonderful idea, and removing red tape for artists is very important. Owners of buildings should be able to approve and fund murals as they want. 

Enhance if well done...  

It would be be a lovely addition to our community. Highlight local talent and add to the vibrancy of our tourism.  

It will improve the look of the city 

Yes very much. I have always wondered why we didn't have many. Princess St appt would benefit from one. 

Adds interest and vibrancy. 

Excellent idea.  The more art work in the city the better. 

Murals add colour and character to our beautiful city 

They improve the look of buildings. They provide focal points for the areas we live in. Some provide a small history lesson of that building or area (think Svenson's garage). Really neat. They certainly provide an interest for tourists too, so can contribute to revenue for businesses.  

Yes but i would see that in the old kingston where all the commerciale businee are. 

I absolutely love the way a mural can brighten up a neighbourhood! It makes a city very dynamic and interesting. 

make the city more colourful and help spruce up areas that may be shabby. 

Taking ugly stone walls and give them life. Love the one at the Legion on Bath road in Collins Bay brings attention to our war hero's and is a true piece of Art. Mural on wall of garage on Front road. Doug Gilmour, Don Cherry , Kirk Muller. Sir John A needs to come off the top of the mural. it has nothing to do with hockey ledgends .  Need new Murals on the wall near the water front in park by Woolen Mills. They look a little sad and need an update.  

I think it would be amazing to have some beautiful and creative murals around Kingston. A series of murals can transform a city into a work of art. I love visiting cities with murals and I would love it if Kingston joined their ranks.  

It will make the city more vibrant, more modern 

Broadly positive - I've seen some nice ones! But there does need to be some quality control. 

This can go either way. Some could find certain things offensive. Art is very subjective. 

I think that it will add to the unique feel of Kingston that is supportive of our diversity. 

I think murals are a great way to make the city look like the vibrant, creative community it is! 

it will be lovely! We should embrace them fully. 

definite improvement. adds character and gives residents a place to display their work. much better than billboards or run down siding. 

Adding art to private property (in public spaces will only add to the beauty, character and appeal of our city.  We can integrate our historic architecture with artistic expression.  Let’s show the rest of the country (and prospective visitors) that we’re so much more than our outdated reputation. 

Eclectic, open to multi art forms 

I enjoy the artwork 

I think they're beautiful and an incredible addition to the art scene! 

I would love to recognize local artists by awarding them a mural space. Bonus points if you could incorporate some sort of walk of fame along the artists corridor 

it would add interest and vibrancy to community....give artists a chance to showcase their work 

I think it can be lovely in the downtown area. Not so much in the suburbs.  

It will make it more vibrant and give it more personality, and spark conversation. I’ve seen murals on garage doors and walls in alleys in Toronto and it’s lovely and wonderful.  

I think it'll add to the great arts and culture of Kingston. I highly support this! 

I think it will contribute to the look and feel of Kingston by showing that we are an artistic community, and that we embrace art of all kinds.  It will be an added attraction for tourists. 

They are an eyesore. 

I think murals will add vibrancy but I worry about those individuals who will add their tags to the murals. 

It will add to the artistic and revitalized vibes that Kingston seems to lack in certain areas. It will also showcase the artwork of (presumably) local talents and strengthen the arts community in this city. Many walls are drab and BEGGING to have something more exciting put on them, it will be an attraction! 

Will be a definite benefit!  As long as it's good art, why not? 

I believe murals (especially by local artists) will add personality to Kingston!  

Will make it more vibrant, colourful, and unique 

Could add vibrancy, colour, diversity 

a way to support artists, and add to the beauty of the city 

They’d be a great addition to the city as long as the design goes well with the building and its surrounding area. Murals can add to the art culture of the city and create more sightseeing spots for people. Murals can also embody meaningful messages. 

I believe they will detract 

Murals add visual interest and character to streetscapes.  

Depending on the subject, it can either enhance or detract.  

It could potentially make the city look like rail cars that have been covered in graffiti. 

I suspect it will make Kingston much more interesting. Regardless, if people have a right to paint their houses or buildings as they wish, they have a right to put murals on them. 

I think that it will make Kingston a more interesting place as long as the murals are not hateful, transphobic, etc.  

Add color and interest and support local (hopefully) artists.  

I’m in favour. There are many blank “canvases” that would be enhanced by art.  

I think murals are especially beautiful, especially if they cover amateurish graffiti and support local artists. I often would photograph such pieces. If a building is old and needs a new face, so be it.  

Vibrant & Modern city. 

I think it’s a great idea. Cities like Toronto, Quebec City especially Montreal have added a large number of interesting and artistic murals that enhance the beauty and interest of the city.  

Love it 

If they add visual interest or preferably show the history of the area they could be attractive and informative. They should blend in and not be a distraction.   

Will brighten things up and add visual appeal to the city 

I don't think it adds anything.  Most I have seen are rather unsightly.   

unique and varied from brink and vinyl siding  

It would add art and culture, a feeling of belonging and expression.  

It will beautify the city.  

I like the idea. I think anywhere a mural can be added to an otherwise “ugly” space is positive. I enjoy some of the other murals that already exist in the city.  

Yes, very much so. 

It will make Kingston look vibrant and contemporary  

It will add a unique flavour to the city, allowing citizens to put their creativity on display 

Good idea long as they are tastefully done. 

They would enhance Kingston's strong image and reputation for arts. Provide further tourist appeal  

It would depend on the mural. If it is tasteful then I believe it will add to the appeal of the city if not it may make to city look trash. 

It’s a great way to support local artists and add to the art scene.  

Visual art can make a huge difference to the look and feel of a place. Having lived in bigger cities with more street art, I can say this is a vibrant cultural area that Kingston does lack. 

Won’t contribute at all.  

It depends on which properties are used, and it also depends on the murals themselves. I can imagine some excellent outcomes and some awful outcomes. 

it depends on the quality of the murals; good quality art will contribute positively to the city  by creating interesting spaces.;poor qualiy are simply offensive 

It will add beauty and funkiness to our awesome city. 

I think it's a good as long as there Standards to what they are . Svenson's Garage on Front Road across from Centre 70  has a nice one and the Legion in Collins Bay another nice one  . Reid's diary another one. Down town parking garage is okay too . 

Yes 

I love the murals I see in Montreal, for example, and the few in Kingston that I'm aware of. For me they add a feeling of friendliness, belonging and community to the city, in addition to beautifying some dull-looking buildings. 

As long as they are done with good materials and there is variety, they can add character, interest and (sometimes) commentary on issues and events. 

Used to live near Pembroke, they have a lot of murals and it definitely improves the look of the town, especially where there is just a big brick wall. 

They would add to the vibrancy of streetscapes. 

Yes 

Make it less plain 

Only as long as they contribute to non-political, non-offensive themes. 

Pleasing to the eye, make people smile  

On residential homes I do not agree. If you have travelled by VIA Rail to Toronto or Montreal, many homes have graffiti and looks like a third world ghetto. 

Meh its a 50 50 gamble some will like it some will hate it.  

It will make areas look much brighter,  fun and cleaner 

Negative.  Trast.  Lowers  the clean appliance of the city..   

unless controlled, it could look like a whole lot of graffiti 

Adding art and colour would increase the vibrancy of any neighbourhood as well as giving it character and culture. 

Adding colour, excitement, humour, information. Bring about reflection about history, geography, biology. A celebration of the many groups of people living in Kingston and who have lived here in the immediate and distant past. 

I think it will beautify the city, make it more vibrant and welcoming. 

Great 

Depends o the mural.  I haven't liked any commercial lookin ones on Brock St to date and don't think they have ceated a plesant atmosphere.  They have looked like space savers. 

If tasteful and positive and maintained they could be an added feature to a neighbourhood  

I was very excited when the mural was being voted on for Division Street. I would love to see more murals in Kingston, on public or private property. They are artistic pops of colour which brighten up your day.  

It will keep things looking interesting. 

visually interesting 

yes 

It is a bright way of showing the heritage of an area 

I think it will add vibrancy; artistic expression is a vital part of reflecting a diverse community 

Love this idea !  The vibrant colours of recent downtown/midtown murals enliven drab areas and help build the community. 

Providing the theme is tasteful and, hopefully, supportive of Kingston's culture and/or history, murals are a welcome addition to some otherwise drab architecture.  

Can enliven the landscape, but could also be detrimental depending on the subject matter and quality of the art. 

Young artists could brighten the city's streets and draw interest to their type of art. 

Increased visibility for local artists, fewer ugly blank walls, more colourful and character in urban environment.  

I don't think that it is a good idea. If there is no standard then anyone can say that something is a mural.  

It will add beautiful color and joy  

I love it. Please, yes. It makes neighbourhoods more interesting and vibrant. 

I think the city should stay out of what on people's private property 

Murals on private property that are visible to the public become a public experience. Kingston is lacking in colour and vibrancy - the limestone is a perfect blank canvas for arts and culture to thrive on public and private property. 

Add visual interest to the streetscape. They are a good thing though I do not think encouraging them should be a high priority for the city.  

I think we are running a very significant risk of creating a city of "eyesores." "Art" is a very subjective expression and open to wide interpretation so the residents of Kingston can be saddled with unappealing sights that the city will be powerless to remove. To be honest, to date the city's art projects (past and present) on public property have been largely ugly _ so-called metal and concrete sculptures along the waterfront, bland paintings supported by concrete road barriers - horrible at worst, uninspired at best.....go to European cities like Burgos, Spain, or closer to home, Montreal, and you will see examples of how public art can be appealing to the majority of citizens. 

Amazingly - this type of art can really add beauty to our city. 

It will make it look trashy 

More positive. Vibrant community expression. Have an opportunity for BIPOC people to display their art. A form of education and beautifying a space at may not be currently attractive..  

Beautiful idea and expression of individuality on one's property  

Depends on the theme but it has the potential to be beautiful. If it were a well done work of art it would make our city a little more attractive. Art is a form of expression, and says we are proud. We have many reasons to be proud of the city and should allow art to contribute to the beauty 

I love the idea that you could add some vibrancy to both your own home and your neighbourhood. It's certainly more expressive to paint a mural than to simply paint your house a single colour. I think it could add interest to neighbourhood walks and maybe inspire folks to live a little more freely in their spaces.  

Depends on the mural and the content 

There is the potential to make the city more beautiful, interesting. 

Visually pleasing art, promote local art, share culture, history, community building, educational, local and international issues, etc. 

If properly done, I think murals can help improve the urban landscape and provide a positive experience for residents and tourists alike. 

I think murals add beauty to our city. I have personally enjoyed seeing the Kingston one, and the one at daft. 

Help the city become more visually vibrant and interesting. Provide spaces for artists to express themselves  

I think murals will add vibrancy, as well as adding a feeling of community spirit.  

yes, I enjoy seeing people's personal creativity in art and sculpture and have always enjoyed seeing, when traveling, the greater freedom of expression typically found only in larger cities. 

Murals can create wonderful colour and life on otherwise drab buildings. They can highlight aspects of culture, arts, and city priorities. 

Murals can add interest to the community and contribute towards a sense of belonging in the community. Seeing a mural could bring a sense of calm or happiness, be good for mental health if you can look out your window and instead of bricks you see a nature scene, a trompe l'oeil, etc 

I think murals are a great way to add and enhance the character of a city. I think of how the many large scale murals on buildings in Montreal enliven the streetscapes and make art a part of everyday life. I can see the Division St. mural from my office and love it as it adds a bright pop of colour to the city.  

Add colour, vibrancy and citizen involvement 

I think that it can be a good edition to the city. 

Love murals on private property.  They add interest to our community. 

I think murals are a wonderful way of enlivening Kingston streets. When I think of my travels to other cities, I often remember - and photograph - the murals. Why not think of walls as a canvas ready to be transformed? Murals, in particular, have the capacity to improve the feel of areas with less attractive structural components, or areas that feel "empty" (e.g. parking lots). 

when the talent is sufficient to the task, regardless of the message, then yes.  It's got to be about real talent.  I fear a City review process is somehow very much out of sync with the 'murals' culture. 

I love them! I think they add life to the city and improve the look of otherwise boring, cookie-cutter condo buildings. Some murals in other cities have even become tourist attractions and murals could open up that potential.  

I think it would be great! There's already a few in Kingston and it would be great to have more, they're very beautiful. 

Adds vibrancy and beauty. Feels positive and expressive 

It will allow citizens to be involved in the artistic character of the city. It will also promote creativity and community, creating a visuality to the city of the people living here. 

I think it is a great idea to showcase the talent and culture of the community 

It will NOT contribute in any way. They are a major source of visual pollution as well as waste of paint and air pollution as well 

We have such a grey city, especially in the winter. I think it will add a much-needed flash of colour and creative inspiration. I think it will also improve our curb appeal for visitors - more photo ops, more incentive to wander and explore and seek out art. 

They will help beautify the city and make the urban environment more vibrant. They will be a valuable form of public art. 

Murals, when done well, can beautify any space. I would love to see more murals throughout Kingston, whether on businesses or residences.  I would love to see different types of art, including graffiti art, so long as the content is family-frienldy. 

They could add vibrancy as well as promote tourism interest. Beautifies the neighbourhood. 

More public art (including murals on private property) is greatly needed to create a more vibrant and enjoyable city. There are so many great examples of integrating murals in the fabric of historic areas that can accent our heritage buildings while creating visual interest, and be attractions in and of themselves. Think of the transformation that a large scale mural on the sides of the Princess Towers (401 Princess St - potentially the ugliest building in the city) would have!  Of course, it would need buy in from the property owner, but surely anything on the side of that building would be an improvement / increase its value! 

It will add character and excitement 

It would be a vast improvement, particularly in the Williamsville part of Princess st. 

I am in general agreement. Makes streetscapes interesting, and adds to tourism , however,  on heritage buildings ( designated) and in Heritage Conservation Districts these items need to be vetted by the Heritage Committee and it subject to a competitive process. 
 Many towns/ villages include historic events, period glimpses into to past on replicated facades. These would be more appropriate for heritage areas/buildings.  
Ex. Van Kleek Hill 

Absolutely. A long overdue measure.  

Would depend on the quality of the art, its relevance to the building & the street, whether it could be removed, and whether the building is historically designated. 

Private property murals will contribute to a more contemporary and current look for the city, it will allow for more freedom of expression and create a look and feel more authentic to the inhabitants of the city. 

Depends on the mural.  

More art is best for the city of kingston and the tourism industry  

TASTEFUL art is always appreciated and should enhance the beauty of the city. Offensive murals that promote certain lifestyles could be a big turn-off. 

I love art, and being able to have murals on private property will make it a fun and friendly vibe.  

give both residents & visitors a sense that our city is Lively and artistic. increase tourism . 

If well done, will add colour and vibrancy. 

It will be an enriching experience showing the diverse artistry of the community. The murals program should continue diversity of representation and inclusion.  

Provided they are done well they add to the overall look of the city. 

Art on display often contributes to any environment.  
I am curious as to why 'Private' has to do with the issue.  
Some people have art on their lawns and that is a personal preference. Perhaps the issue of 'Private' may be more of a consideration when the built environment is governed in part by Federal, Provincial, and/or Municipal policies such as with historically designated properties, districts, and neighborhoods. 

They can enliven a space. They can also make a space less appealing. And too many of them can be too much. Or too many all in the same style -- e.g. homey history. They can also deteriorate over time and detract from a neighbourhood.  

Tapping into youth culture and their individual expressions of art will ensure an ever growing and culturally diverse art scene in the city of Kingston.  

Locals will enjoy it. Tourists will take photos and tell others!  

If painted on drab concrete walls and on industrial buildings , they can relieve the ugliness inherent in those structures. That is one big positive feature of murals. 

Depends on if they are tatseful, or just grafitti... 

It is a great initiative to help showcase the city as more aesthetically pleasing to modern contemporaries, as it amalgamates the modern art and ancient architecture to bring a whole new perspective to the city. It will attract more art lovers to this more unique city.  

Publicly displayed art, meaning in public view on public and private property, is vital to the health and vibrancy of a community. Without it, a community can wither. So I believe such murals can feed the soul and enrich our lives. They culturally enliven us and contribute to our city’s positive reputation. They foster interaction and discussion among citizens and invite visitors to experience our cultural lifestyle. 

If properly done they can add some nice colour to the city. 

Good public art adds interest, encourages reflection, and generally enriches a space, whether it's public or private. Cities become known for their public art. 

Will help revitalize certain parts of the city and make them less boring/dilapidated looking 

There is a strong suggestion in this survey that the approval process should be streamlined.  In fact, it is challenging if the City is to encourage each new development to incorporate some form of public art as is currently stated. My concern is that the murals should be cautiously approved with the input of the Kingston Heritage Properties Committee for all properties that are listed or designated on the Heritage Register, as well as all those properties that fall within the Heritage Character Areas set out in the City's Official Plan on Schedule 9.  Murals should be sympathetic to the building where it is being located. As a normal course of events, painting a brick or stone surface is NOT recommended, because the removal of the paint adversely affects the surface.  What time frame are these murals recommended for - maintenance is critical.   Also, how are Indigenous murals to be vetted, such as the Molly Brant mural on an existing wall? There are a great many issues that need to be considered and the suggestion that the process is to be streamlined when the public art policy specifically says that it is not to be considered on private buildings is objectionable. 

Will freshen the drab monotony of large portions of the city. 

I really like the look of murals and fully encourage displaying art wherever people are okay with it. 

Will contribute to culture/local art/Kingston's history 

Murals are known for brightening up cities, showcasing local talent, and amplifying culture. I would love to have more murals downtown, and throughout Kingston.  

I LOVE cities and neighbourhoods with murals! As long as they are kept up (paint not peeling, etc), they tell a story, add colour and vibrancy, and give people something to enjoy & talk about.  

Extremely positively! It will add colour, inspire conversation and connect people to their surroundings in a whole new way! Murals will bring a completely new dimension to the city, making it feel like a living installation. It will delight and move people. Murals are a pleasure to experience, alone and in connection with others. Their presence communicates a city’s understanding of the power of art, the value of artists, and the importance of change, transformation and re-imagination.  

Although murals on private property can enhance the look and feel of Kingston it is important that there are processes in place, including public consultation, to ensure that what is proposed is properly vetted, appropriate and accompanied by a maintenance plan. 

dont pay for any more 

None. Get jiggy with it.  

Personally I have no concerns other than quality, and those who would ruin a piece by tagging some stupid graffiti name. But I'm sure there will be those concerned with obscenity.  

certain groups of people (that have no authority) trying to govern or control what can and can not be painted or seen in public spaces even when it’s not profanity or explicit content. I ran into this situation painting a local gym and while painting what the client asked for a group of people working out felt the female and male characters i was asked to paint were not “inclusive” 

No concerns. No ideas at this time. 

Vandalism, graffiti - but that's always a concern.  Actually, if there were a few buildings that were designated as graffiti buildings, it could be a great place for artists to graffiti legally  

More graffiti is not required in Kingston 

Disturbing imagery/language 
Loss of property value for neigbourhood 

None 

I hope there is no approval process required when someone wants to create a mural on their property. It would be nice if there were no applications, fees, or other hoops to jump through, so there is nothing discouraging property owners from pursuing murals. 

I feel this City is trying to make everything look like a mess. First the grass now painting up our properties. Seriously, what next?I do not want to look at any mural near me. If I want a painting I'll buy one! 

I have now concerns when they're improving an old dilapidated building. 

some will be downright ugly/and make the property looks worse 

Hopefully murals will be related to the neighborhood and cultural of Kingston . 

inappropriate visuals - should have a set criteria the artwork must meet 

None really. As long as the art doesn't depict hurtful or offensive themes.  

Maintenance - aged murals deteriorating won't help the city 
 Advertising, political, racist etc. content (some advertising, like that related to festivals, could be useful, but there needs to be a way of ensuring it gets taken down.) 

No concerns, bring on all the murals! I think vetting the artists is likely a good idea to make sure the art is a certain caliber.  

Obviously there should be agreement by the owners of the property and some consideration of the opinions of the surrounding property owners -- without personal tastes derailing expert opinion about the quality of the work. Murals should probably be relatively non-controversial -- maybe not the place to be pushing the bounds of cultural convention.  

Please award the call outs to the best artwork and ideas presented.  
If priority of the awards will be given  to minorities, indigenous groups, etc.  let everyone know.   

Should not be allowed on heritage buildings 

I don't have any. 

As a renter, I would like to understand the process of getting permission to create a mural on the property I rent. There is a perfect space contender for a mural in the parking lot behind the house and I would be interested in creating a mural on it but I would want to go through the appropriate due process. 

no concerns, plenty of artist in Kingston with wonderful ideas 

The intention to allow a mural to be put on the side of a building should not be used as an excuse for otherwise poor urban planning or new development. It should be just one part of a vibrant and considered community that is interesting, accessible and welcoming to all. 

they should not promote private poltical views 

I suppose it would be bad to have offensive subject matter, but perhaps that could be based on an only if there’s a complaint type system. Otherwise just let people do what they want with their own property  

Maintenance of the artwork.  

I am concerned that this change will encourage low quality artwork and tagging of buildings.  

Could be unsightly to immediate neighbours  

They may not be kept in good condition. 

Anybody could theoretically have absolutely no talent and throw different paint on a piece of plywood and call it a mural. That there should be a specific from any roadway so  they cannot obstruct traffic or block the view of ongoing traffic. Also they should be some control over type of images depicted in any murals. Maybe a licence or permit to have some “limited” control over murals.  

Common decency standards, no profanity, nudity, etc. 

Defacement  
Inappropriate displays  

None 

The only concern would be making sure that the contain of the artwork needs to be maintained in order not to become an eyesore.As an idea to promote the program,  set up a competion with some sort of reward.  Also prior to allowing an artist to begin the work they must submit a colour sketch of their work. A theme  or maybe a couple of themes depending on the area of the city, would add to the interest. eg.  Building surfaces in the downtown core could display Kingston's history. Buildings somewhat removed from downtown could display pictures of nature. 

My concern would be that city officials would give into NIMBYs. No concerns about the art itself. 

I don’t think murals should be used to advance political ideologies or to denigrate others’ views.  They should be purely “artistic”.  

No concerns, but I would love for the city to support local artists and pair them up with businesses by providing some subsidies. We need some beautification and culture in this city! 

Work poorly executed, or not enduring. Also the risk of vandalism concerns me.  

No concerns as the assumption would be made that nothing of profanity would be displayed and artists would be respectful of the family friendly community Kingston is.  

only that some messaging could be political or religious ie on churches etc 

The selection process. Who will determine the criteria and process of submitting proposals? Who will choose the jurors? What is the criteria for choosing jurors? Will there be consideration given to location of murals all around Kingston? The latest mural on Division St near Princess is in a location that is not easily visible. Would like to see murals in places that can be seen from different vantage points. 

The city or property owner should be careful that they don't get defaced with graffiti.  However, high up is good and out of reach of vandals, like a building on Division Street at Princess which can be seen from Brock Street - very colourful. 

Keep murals respectful and appropriate  

First and foremost: Use LOCAL talent! Absolutely imperative. Make them visible. Perhaps use a voting system to vote on mural ideas, certainly for the area the mural is being painted in. Other than that it's a brilliant idea!  

Should be approved before doing the work to unsure it remain respectful for everyone 

I have no concerns as long as they are appropriate.  

Should not be political or send a sexist/raciest message. 

That they will be professionally done and be judged before they are painted. That they are in good condition and if not they are given a warning to fix it or they have to  paint over it.  

My only concerns relate to poor quality or material that will fade or chip over time. But I trust that professional mural artists have the right type of material. 

Inappropriate language, e.g., rascist.  

There needs to be some parameters about what is appropriate - some criteria and guidance.  

Who would approve the murals? And why do we need this? Kingston has enough on its plate to be policing murals. 

None. 

That people's art will be vandalized. That people will put up offensive or purposely divisive and inflaming works. There should be a simple policy and community review board, but generally, the city should let people put up the art they want to put up and should get out of the way on this initiative.  

none 

Designs for highly-visible areas should be pre-submitted for approval.  This should not be a difficult, long or prohibitive process.  Variety and different perspectives are valuable.  I think political messages are fine, but non-inclusive messages, or hate speech are obviously not in line with our standards as a community, and should be avoided 

Inclusive most important. 

none 

I have concerns of inappropriate subject matter, or glorification of illegal activity. 

my concerns: colors such as neon, size of mural and subject matter to some extent (guns, genitalia etc)  

They need to be tasteful and reflect the history and architecture of the area.  

I suppose I wouldn’t be too happy if suddenly there was a hideous painting I had to see out my window every day, so I do see there being neighbour disputes and vandalism. Also, let’s say a neighbour painted a big pot leaf on their garage - it may cause tension and change the vibe of a whole neighbourhood. Or let’s say someone painted an homage to a historical Canadian figure that was shown to have been racist as a passive aggressive form of racism against a neighbour - etc. but unless something is a hate crime or breaches a decency law,  you get into a whole censorship argument… but can’t people do as they wish with their property? Its more complex that it seems on the surface.  

No concerns – I feel it it would be great! 

My only concerns would be murals that promote hate speech or infringe in any way on human rights. 

Do not allow them 

I would like not to be held responsible for vandalism/graffiti on murals owned by me.  For example, individuals have tagged my property in the past and then it then falls to me to clean it up.  Why should I have to bear the brunt of someone else's bad behaviour? 

With the exception of guidelines around profanity, I have no concerns. Provocative pieces can spark excellent discussion and rich debate, which is healthy and strengthens communities! 

Maybe some control over content?  Let's not get nasty or obscene 

The potential for bigoted statements or imagery exists, but will hopefully be mitigated somehow 

Abstract designs would be cool. Plus other pictures that represent kingston’s history and culture.  

May look run-down & ratty if not kept up 

they would need to be tasteful, so I think there would need to have guidelines 

Aesthetically pleasing murals 

The surrounding houses will have to perhaps live with a large mural that they have to look at each day that they don't agree with the message.  An eye sore.  Keep the attractions in the downtown core or on city property.  We pay taxes and so should have some sort of control of what we see out of our "residential" windows. 

Murals should not contain racist, homophobic words or images, hate speech etc.  

Ultra-modern, abstract designs being slathered over historical buildings would be unfortunate.  

Who judges what is socially appropriate art. 

As I say above, it seems completely unacceptable to restrict how people can decorate the outsides of their houses or buildings provided that such decoration does not actually intrude on the property of others (e.g., bright lights). Restriction of commercial purposes seems acceptable. 

See above.  

The upkeep of the murals are of concern as they age. What provisions will be put in place to support maintenance of the murals. Also how many murals are where? You don't want clutter nor advertising.  

None 

No concerns as this relates to private property that the owner has the right to modify within reason. If it is sanctioned by the owner and approved by the city, I have no problem with it.  

Murals should be at few strategic locations. Not exceeding 5/7 Murals in the city. Should be of very high standard/quality. Selection criteron should be top notch to be vetted by World renowned Expert. 

I don’t. Of course, you might get bad art, but that happens with public sculpture too. And people are always free to express opinions if they feel something is too outrageous or inappropriate.  

Graffiti looking or nit maintained. 

How to ensure the mall is not offending 

They don't add anything to the neighborhood.   

proposed murals should require approval 

None  

My concern is inappropriate messaging.  

It would be important that artwork does not portray anything violent, offensive, racist etc. Permits should be required for murals over a certain size so that they can be approved in advance to avoid this. 

I think it would make all areas and side streets more interesting when you travel thru them. Also when tourists come thru it would encourage them to travel thru the city and in turn bring capitol to smaller business that are in less travelled areas if there was no art. Good or bad anything that piques interest. 

None! Public art is awesome - Montreal / plateau has so much! We were going to commission a mural on an exterior wall, I didn't even know it was not allowed..hands off private property please!!  

Biggest concern would be nature of content on display, where to draw the line between creative freedom and obscenity 

None. Its up to the property owners to decide. 

As I reflect on the possibility of my next door neighbour having a mural I w/not want it imposingly large.  

Unfortunately beauty is in the eye of the beholder, I've seen great looking graffiti and art that I thought was abysmal.   

None 

Rude or offensive murals, though I assume that the reviewing committees would veto such installations. 

Sounds like graffiti, will be graffiti. Art should be private or in a public space, not disturbing the peace of a neighborhood.  

If a mural is added close to a home's windows, it could be unpleasant to have to look at the mural all the time. 
 And what about maintenance? Murals won't last forever. Will they be maintained? Erased? Painted over? 
 Who gets to choose the artist(s)? The property owner? Or will the murals be vetted by one or more people who have the interests of the neighbourhood as a whole in mind? 

quality and topic need to be appropriate;  

None.  

I fine with them but think the City should have a set of standards or a way to approve them on case to case . There got to be some kind of standards and rules . 

'Concerns: 
 - Aesthetics (hire professional artists, use good materials, maintain the murals over time) 
 - Proper compensation for artists 
Ideas:  
Kingston should do an annual mural festival where many properties get murals in the same week. Lots of cities have taken this approach. It's a great way to quickly add personality and create destinations for visitors and locals alike. Here's an example from Edmonton: https://globalnews.ca/news/5743840/rust-magic-international-festival-murals-edmonton-streets/ 

I have concerns abouthe appropriateness of the murals, and who will decide about their appropriateness. There are aesthetic issues as well as cultural ones; as in perceptions of beauty and the potential to offend. Making these decisions can be fraught; I hope an open but not onerous process can be found. It's worth the effort. 

That deterioration is allowed. That inappropriate or objectionable ideas could be expressed. 

Content, while nothing should be censored graphic content or POLITCAL content should not be allowed. All murals should be unbiased and not push anyone’s agenda. 

Wondering how the City will manage freedom of expression vs neighbour concerns when it comes to controversial images.  

None it owners property 

None various views 

There would need to be both a size limit and a number per street quota. The murals should be on the dwelling and not free-standing.  There is a potential for a clutter of hideous statements throughout a neighbourhood. 
 Art is interpreted by the viewer and as such the same piece can be seen as many different things depending on who is asked, this can lead to total pleasure to total dissatisfaction from neighbours. Neighbours should have the right to reject requests. The property must be owned by the person wishing to host the mural. 

I think it’s a great idea. Fully support  

Hate, racial or gang signs will be hard to control. Advertising will appear as murals. 

As long as they meet ethical guide lines and are done with taste I dont have an issue.  

As long as they are well done, not graffiti  

Paint over the mural with a solid white! 

large political single issue murals,  

They shouldn't be political in any regard.  

I’d like our house to have a mural!  

I think there should be rules in place to not allow murals to depict graphic violence or sex, nor contain profanity and hateful language.  

That they will be bad 

The quality of the work.  Do not want tto see commercial work displyed by anyone certainly not machine printed ones such as on Brock St in the past.  Artists hand created only.  Concerned about the look of grafity.  

Negative, skulls & demons would not be appreciated. If bored angry people try to override or destroy them 

Obviously we wouldn’t want any murals that were pornographic in nature as everyone will be able to see them including children and that would not be good.  

None 

no concerns -  

If approved by the city... it is a great idea 

Inclusivity. I hope that the application process will be low barrier, open minded and reflective of the diversity within our community. An idea to consider might be connecting with social service agencies to create opportunities for members of our vulnerable populations to feel included and empowered. Artistic expression, be it music or art, is a powerful tool for change. 

The only concern I have relates to the mural theme: theme must be positive and inclusive (no symbols/language etc of hate groups etc) 

Potentially offensive or controversial themes, although I realize there is a fine line between what is acceptable and not, and it depends on a person's beliefs and perspective. 

Is there a way to control the subject matter or quality or the mural? Can there be an approval process? Or will it be wide open to whatever the owner wishes to display?  

Political and religious messages should not be part of these artistic murals. Also advertising for commercial gain should be separated from the mural art initiative. 

Possibility of racist/xenophobic/sexist/ableist etc messages. How the city will approve and/or police which murals are acceptable for private property. Alternatively the possibility of excessive bureaucratic involvement and difficulty getting murals approved. Fine line for the city to walk between censorship and preventing hateful messages to be displayed in Kingston.  

It can make an area look junky or run down. It can encourage graffiti.   

I would hope they are family friendly, no political or (obviously) any kind of hate-centred imagery or words.  

My concerns are that there will be racist/homophobic etc murals  

The messaging. That's why it's important to have municipal oversight. 

None as long as they are not billboards in disguise. The city should not be regulating what people paint of walls they own.  

Junk welded together and declared "art." 
 Graffiti called "art." 
 Statures or paintings that disrupt/distract from the existing beauty of the resident neighbourhood 
 Offensive statements or portrayals. 
 I don't trust the city to effectively enforce the by-laws guiding any new policy. 

None 

It will be like graffiti on people's property. Not sure why we are even spending time debating this. Why not focus on something more important that actually helps people? 

How do we keep them maintained. What if graffiti or hate comments are placed over them? How do we ensure equity and who gets to paint these murals? Will the artist be paid for it? I will pay for it? The city or the private owner? 

Zero 

I would prefer it not look like graffiti. A big beautiful mural is one thing, a bunch of tag lines is another 

Unfortunately, quite a few. There's NIMBYs, to start with, which Kingston is full of. I'd be concerned about whether my taste in art matched my neighbours, since they'd be the ones looking at it, not me. You mentioned an application process: maybe it would be wise to add a section asking whether applicants have consulted the neighbours, not for their approval but in consideration of shared space.  I'd wonder about subject matter as well - private property suggests the mural owner would have authority over what is painted, but the application process you mentioned suggests otherwise. That will be tricky, as I can foresee you'd get proposals that are controversial. The criteria would need to be very clear and justifiable. Would people be allowed to do the work themselves, or would they be expected to retain a professional artist?  

May be an issue re the message of the mural and also the artistic quality, eg gang tags 

Some might be distasteful, offensive or otherwise objectionable. 

Would be nice if the local community has a day in the art and where it goes 

I think it's important to let artists and property owners express themselves creatively, I would be concerned about any content that is of a commercial nature, or content with a political message. I would think the content should be representative of the city and its inhabitants. 

Being defaced  

I would expect some people to have opposition to some artistic expression and the city will need to make efforts to not be involved in excessive censorship. Murals should only be blocked if they show distinct offensive messages. 

I have no concerns about murals on private property  

This creative expression should not include any hate messaging against individuals or groups, or graphic violence. 

As a highly visible medium that can be seen as being supported beyond the private owner, they absolutely must be vetted and approved in some way to ensure they meet with the cities guidelines. 

That the murals could be distasteful - what if a person wants to make a moral statement based on their belief which could potentially affect others - for example Abortion - a graphic mural may bring trauma to some, or be difficult for young children to see 
 If murals are used to make a political statement - how do we monitor this on private property? What are the rights of neighbors? The individual? 
 There are currently some lovely murals painted on houses 
 There also have been some nice murals at the waterfront that have been defaced. 
 Is a huge graffiti signature on he side of a wall considered a mural? Graffiti itself is fine - as the Agnes Heatherington building has shown - even though it has been contentious in the community having those who approve and those who don't 

No concerns, really. I think there should be a minimal level of oversight to ensure the content gets over a low bar for approval (nothing vulgar or otherwise inappropriate; nothing that would be unduly distracting) and that the materials used to create are longlasting so the art doesn't begin to look shabby after a short period of time.  

As long as no hateful or otherwise illegal words or pictures are used I have no concerns. 

I have concerns that many murals might look dated soon. 

none 

None. 

No concerns, other than mentioned in Q2, it's got to be about talent! 

I have some concerns about them being used for advertisements or political messages. It would be nice if they could be restricted to artwork only.  

No concerns 

Resident's complaints and objections to art pieces they may not like or agree with. 

I have no concerns. Let people do what they want with their property.  

None really - only concern would be to ensure there are rules/parameters around the content that can be included in the mural (nothing offensive/vulgar, etc). I assume this is in the new policy but I have not had time to review in detail.  

Simply defaces property 

My concern is about the rules being too prescriptive, or NIMBYism. I think the challenge will be balancing what people consider to be art. 

That they not be offensive or insulting, and that they be appropriate to the surroundings - for example, a mural that overlooks an elementary school might be more restricted in what it depicts than one overlooking the Hub. 

My only concern would be content that is not family-friendly (swear words graffiti, etc.). I would want there to be a policy so that people don't view it as a free pass to vandalize others' property. 

Concern is the size if it blocks traffic or sight lines. And if they are an eye sore. 

Nay sayers will say it will detract from the heritage value of our City. I couldnt disagree more - and a look at other mural filled cities with strong heritage characteristics shows both can co-exist. Though not a small undertaking, it would be great to develop an annual "Mural Fest" program in Kingston, similar to programs in Montreal and elsewhere. This would require an open call for interested property owners who have potential space for murals / who would like to participate in the program. The city / program administrator would then identify a number of locations annually and put out a call to artists for proposals. Then, over the course of a few weeks in the height of summer tourist season, "mural fest" would come to life and residents and tourists could come to see the new murals be painted. This is not a cost free program, but one that would significantly benefit the community through improved public realm, create an additional draw for tourists (mural walks are definitely a thing!) and support artists local and elsewhere. I strongly support the proposed policy update and would fully support setting aside funding to support development of a mural program in Kingston - surely we could draw from our bloated police budget, if we can't find funding elsewhere. Thank you! 

None 

Commitment to maintenance so they remain attractive. 

Garish murals on heritage facades. Possible graffiti after installation....  

Only that they be non-partisan . . . not touting controversial views or false information 

Kingston has an attractive, historical streetscape, except for the horrors that have been erected on Princess St (Williamsville area).  The City tries to sell itself as historic, but continually gives building permissions that counter its policy.  Murals might contribute - maybe redoing the old signs, but an oversight committee committed to decisions not politically motivated would be essential. 

No concerns. I love the idea of the city being able to more vibrantly showcase the depth of culture and diversity here through public art on private property because it will allow for enhanced nuance.  

The Frontenac Historical Foundation and Kingston Historical Society should be consulted about the suitability of murals. Too much attention may be given to current popularity (guaranteed to get the average vote) rather than attending to broader issues. 

Make sure to remove graffiti that provides no value and is an eyesore 

As long as they are non-political and do not promote certain lifestyles that may offend others, they should be okay. They should be as neutral as possible.  

I would love to be able to do this, as someone graffitied on my garage siding and it will not completely come off. Would love to hire an artist to cover it up by creating a beautiful mural 

non political and non offensive art  only 

No murals on heritage buildings.  Concerns about the quality of the art. 

That the process is fair and equitable.  

none 

The concern I have about any mural is its maintenance.  
Most applied finishes require upkeep. That upkeep requires access, skilled attention, and funds. Art in public view suffering the effects of time can look as unfortunate as a tattered flag. 
 Any art will have an effect on its immediate environment whether or not the property is private. Properties that are designated, are next to, or are in a view plane, of designated properties will be affected by applied art and care must be taken to ensure the work contributes appropriately to the setting the historic elements contribute. 
 I do not support art applied to historic structures as it contributes to a 'billboard' setting and will suffer the effects of time. Coatings on historic materials can seal a fabric that was meant to breathe thereby contributing to the fabric's demise.    

They can be inappropriate and have unwelcome images -- violence, racial slurs, nudity -- and detract from the public spaces to which they are adjacent. They can also be trite, unartistic, and unwelcome. Wherever they are visible from a public space, they should not be left to the private property owner to create without approval by the city -- public notice, discussion, decision. They are not trivial.  

Groups like Concrete Canvas have been promoting tasteful public murals in city scapes for years now, having a group like that to branch into Kingston to mentor projects do that align with the values of the city. 

I really enjoy the optical 
 Illusions - like a old fashioned village painted in a plain wall.  

It would be inappropiate to have blatantly sexist, racist, pornographic murals, but I would assume that the approval process would take care of that. 

There is a fine line between art and eyesore. How is this going to be monitored? 

I feel that different type of art styles should be explored for each location which can ensure constant build up of interest among the audience throughout their art walk expeditions making it an immersive experience for them.  This can turn into good a topic of discussion and expression for artists.  

I support municipal financing of public art, as well as the encouragement of private donations to present it, as art on public display is part of a community’s expression and cultural embodiment. But it is important to avoid government censorship of the art, to allow artistic visions to be displayed. 

I am open as to what the murals are, my concern is that they could attract graffiti  

Property owners have to work with the city to ensure quality and accountability (working conditions, insurance, deadlines, financial involvement of the City, juried selection of artist, community input, etc.). The art has to be accessible in some way to the public. Ideally local artists would be employed to create the murals . The murals should not be an advertising vehicle for the property owner. 

I'd like to see the murals be fun and creative with minimal corporate influence (i.e. I don't want to see giant painted billboards on walls). I'd like it if there were incentives in place for the murals to be created by local kingston artists. 

The public art policy specifically says under S. 2.2 that it excludes private lands. So the changes to the policy will be significant.  Staff took the position that the north wall at 168 Wellington is not a heritage attribute, but all walls really should be considered a heritage attribute, because like roofs and windows, they are inherent to the building's structure. The City has controls over signage in heritage districts like Market Square, and signs have been traditionally been reviewed by the heritage staff and the heritage committee - so a similar approach is needed for murals.  The downtown could look very messy if one starts to throw up murals on all sorts of private properties.  In some municipalities, ghost signs (old advertisements) are repainted to great effect, but if we are starting to talk about a Tragically Hip mural on some large building in the downtown, (which is nearly all within a Heritage Character Area) you will need clear direction, as the City has in its sign by-law.  We want the downtown to retain its fantastic architectural mix of stone and brick buildings.   

None. 

Some people may not want a mural on their property. As long as they agreed to have it done, I think it's awesome. 

0 concerns as long as historical integrity is respected.  

Historic buildings may want to remain as original, so murals are a better fit for new builds, restoration, and anywhere else! 

Obviously, it's hard to ensure that all murals will be perceived as appropriate for all viewing audiences. Hopefully, blantant profanity, prejudice, or other provocative content that could be seen as negative or hurtful should not be allowed. But I'm not sure how you police and ensure that on private property. 

More is more!!! Can’t wait. 

Proposed murals on private property that are in a Heritage Conservation District, Heritage Character Area or on or adjacent to a Heritage Designated Building should be reviewed and approved by both Heritage Planning Staff and the Kingston Heritage Properties Committee during the planning process.